Comments on: NO to No-Fault for Drunk Drivers http://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/ Strategies in Content Creation Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bbrian017http://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-82 bbrian017 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:24:31 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-82 Well I’m sort of the fence with this one. Firstly don’t get me wrong I hate people who drink and drive but if they are loaded enough to not think about the consequences should they be help liable and not covered for personal injury?This really is a tricky situation but once again the insurance companies are trying to scam. They want to collect collect but pay less all the time. What an amazing business to get into. Well I’m sort of the fence with this one. Firstly don’t get me wrong I hate people who drink and drive but if they are loaded enough to not think about the consequences should they be help liable and not covered for personal injury?

This really is a tricky situation but once again the insurance companies are trying to scam. They want to collect collect but pay less all the time. What an amazing business to get into.

]]> By: bbrian017http://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-941 bbrian017 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:24:00 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-941 Well I’m sort of the fence with this one. Firstly don’t get me wrong I hate people who drink and drive but if they are loaded enough to not think about the consequences should they be help liable and not covered for personal injury?This really is a tricky situation but once again the insurance companies are trying to scam. They want to collect collect but pay less all the time. What an amazing business to get into. Well I’m sort of the fence with this one. Firstly don’t get me wrong I hate people who drink and drive but if they are loaded enough to not think about the consequences should they be help liable and not covered for personal injury?

This really is a tricky situation but once again the insurance companies are trying to scam. They want to collect collect but pay less all the time. What an amazing business to get into.

]]> By: Higher Liability Limits Save Families with Teen Drivers | Albany Insurance Professionalhttp://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-79 Higher Liability Limits Save Families with Teen Drivers | Albany Insurance Professional Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:08:12 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-79 [...] Out the Bodily Injury Liability and Personal Injury Protection Benefits on your Auto Insurance [...] [...] Out the Bodily Injury Liability and Personal Injury Protection Benefits on your Auto Insurance [...]

]]> By: Ryan Hanleyhttp://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-75 Ryan Hanley Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:45:13 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-75 In NYS, the coverage commonly referred to as No-Fault is officially called Personal Injury Protection and would be more appropriately nicknamed "regardless of fault" benefits. In a non-dwi scenario, these benefits pay no matter what the situation and regardless of who's at fault.Thank you[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us '0 which is not a hashcash value. In NYS, the coverage commonly referred to as No-Fault is officially called Personal Injury Protection and would be more appropriately nicknamed “regardless of fault” benefits. In a non-dwi scenario, these benefits pay no matter what the situation and regardless of who’s at fault.

Thank you

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.

]]> By: Ryan Hanleyhttp://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-940 Ryan Hanley Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:45:00 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-940 In NYS, the coverage commonly referred to as No-Fault is officially called Personal Injury Protection and would be more appropriately nicknamed "regardless of fault" benefits. In a non-dwi scenario, these benefits pay no matter what the situation and regardless of who's at fault.Thank you[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us '0 which is not a hashcash value. In NYS, the coverage commonly referred to as No-Fault is officially called Personal Injury Protection and would be more appropriately nicknamed “regardless of fault” benefits. In a non-dwi scenario, these benefits pay no matter what the situation and regardless of who’s at fault.

Thank you

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.

]]> By: Heimerhttp://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Heimer Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:05:42 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-74 How is it even possible that someone can be drunk and involved in a no-fault accident? If somehow it is possible, then alcohol certainly can't play a part in it. Therefore I'd say it's unfair to deny no-fault claims. How is it even possible that someone can be drunk and involved in a no-fault accident? If somehow it is possible, then alcohol certainly can’t play a part in it. Therefore I’d say it’s unfair to deny no-fault claims.

]]> By: Heimerhttp://www.ryanhanley.com/2009/10/09/patterson-says-no-to-no-fault-for-drunk-drivers/comment-page-1/#comment-939 Heimer Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:05:00 +0000 http://www.ryanhanley.com/?p=351#comment-939 How is it even possible that someone can be drunk and involved in a no-fault accident? If somehow it is possible, then alcohol certainly can't play a part in it. Therefore I'd say it's unfair to deny no-fault claims. How is it even possible that someone can be drunk and involved in a no-fault accident? If somehow it is possible, then alcohol certainly can’t play a part in it. Therefore I’d say it’s unfair to deny no-fault claims.

]]>